Aggregating subjective probabilities: some limitative theorems
نویسنده
چکیده
1 Introduction Suppose that n individuals, labeled 1,..., n 9 wish to assign consensual probabilities to a sequence of events E u ..., E k which partition some set of possibilities. Let their subjective assignments be registered in an n x k matrix P = (Pij), where py denotes the subjective probability assigned by individual / to event Ej. The question of how to aggregate the probabilities in P into a single sequence of consensual probabilities may be abstractly modeled as the problem of choosing a mapping (hereafter called a probability aggregation method, or PAM)
منابع مشابه
The Concept of Sub-independence and Its Application in Statistics and Probabilities
Many Limit Theorems, Convergence Theorems and Characterization Theorems in Probability and Statistics, in particular those related to normal distribution , are based on the assumption of independence of two or more random variables. However, the full power of independence is not used in the proofs of these Theorems, since it is the distribution of summation of the random variables whic...
متن کاملRepresentation Theorems and Realism
The representation theorems of expected utility theory show that having certain types of preferences is both necessary and sufficient for being representable as having subjective probabilities. However, unless the expected utility framework is simply assumed, such preferences are also consistent with being representable as having degrees of belief that do not obey the laws of probability. This ...
متن کاملReflexivity and the diagonal argument in proofs of limitative theorems
This paper discusses limitations of reflexive and diagonal arguments as methods of proof of limitative theorems (e.g. Gödel’s theorem on Entscheidungsproblem, Turing’s halting problem or Chaitin-Gödel’s theorem). The fact, that a formal system contains a sentence, which introduces reflexitivity, does not imply, that the same system does not contain a sentence or a proof procedure which solves t...
متن کاملProbabilistic Opinion Pooling
How can several individualsopinions on some factual matters be aggregated into uni ed collective opinions? This question arises in many contexts. A panel of climate experts may have to aggregate the panelistsconicting opinions into a compromise view, in order to deliver a report to the government. A jury may have to arrive at a collective opinion on the facts of a case, despite disagreements...
متن کاملCan There Be Reasons for Putting Limitations on Classical Logic ?
The question in the title is answered with a yes, albeit with a special proviso. In the first place the answer agrees with Pat Suppes' words "there are a number of reasons for moving very slowly to the adoption of a new logic." Secondly, the strategy proposed is not to move to a new logic but to put limitations or filters on Classical Logic when needed. This is based on the conviction that thos...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
دوره 25 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1984